(in riferimento all'articolo apparso sul Il Tirreno - cronaca di Pistoia del 11/01/2011)
I dati riportati dall'Assessore provinciale con deleghe al lavoro, Roberto Cappellini, sulla funzionalità dei centri per l'impiego, relativamente al collocamento lavorativo dei disabili, non rispecchiano la situazione reale. A conferma di questo basterebbe confrontarsi con quei non pochi disabili, che da ormai troppo tempo vivono la triste realtà della disoccupazione in mancanza di una concreta azione di supporto e d'indirizzo da parte centers of employment, or to meet and hear directly from the considerations expressed on the assistants and social workers (public and private) who have charge of these subjects, even up to deal with some of the operators use the same center. Sorry to see that this work on the "field", which involves listening and inquiry, no longer a part of the political force of the left, and how to use the prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, is preferred to rely on percentages, graphs and tables, which have the effect of impact taped over your mouth, even though you know very well, as in this case, the reality is another. I most likely will be particularly unfortunate because for years I note a completely different situation from that described the Councillor Caps. As a social worker reflected pluriproblematiche fact that many people with disabilities, contact your local employment (sheltered workshops) without receiving an accompanying working properly. Last but not least, the situation of a man aged 53 with wife and two dependent children, disabled, writing to the protected categories, with that deep sense of despair over a year, although in almost daily use and reserve center jobs, has never been even a job interview with a 'business. This can not be considered an isolated case because so many other subjects ormai da diversi anni, anche più giovani, si rivolgono a me e alla cooperativa sociale che rappresento, lamentando la solita situazione. Potrei anche dirle che la percezione da parte dell'opinione pubblica, che qualcosa sull'inserimento lavorativo dei disabili non funzioni, è dimostrata anche dalle 428 firme (per adesso solamente tramite una petizione on – line) raccolte dal mese di Novembre ad oggi.
Fatta questa premessa provo a rivolgerle alcune osservazioni sui dati da lei riportati:
-
Lei riferisce che dal 2000 ad oggi il numero dei disabili assunti tramite i Centri per l'Impiego è di 1710, come se questo “risultato” fosse la conseguenza a job to accompany the disabled only played by the operators of job centers. In fact I believe that this figure is to be charged in addition to the private social sector, especially the initiative of individuals and also disabled, even those in possession of more coverage socio - economic and family and "knowledge" personal, individual who had a direct approach with companies that were required by hiring and then they have been hired. The administrative procedure is that the company, prior to the protected categories of disability in writing, require a security clearance at the center use, and once issued the permit (as usually happens) the disabled is taken by the company itself. In that event, the assumption is formally used by the center, but it's just a bureaucratic step, the registration can not be considered the role of the center used as a factor in recruitment. Consequently, the assumptions as of 1710 can not be a factor that demonstrates the functionality of the employment centers.
-
The number of shares that she refers to well-targeted 728 people in the years 2009 to 2010, are mainly of talks between the disabled person and operators. Many of these conversations and meetings do not have a counterpart in terms of employment, or accompanying work, internship or apprenticeship type business. Actions which are mostly in the center use is limited to collecting requests to fill vacancies by the disabled and simply fax it to the companies, which in turn will choose the disabled and their discretion with which to play while the first talks work. Many disabled people are discarded, not called any job interview, simply forgotten, and disappear from the formal center numbers to use, even if the hardship and unemployment in these subjects remains.
-
You talk about agreements with the Department of Mental Health ASL 3 of Pistoia and joint working with operators of employment centers using the term accompanying the work, when in fact these types of intervention are referred to as a member of the routes - therapeutic, which are not real job placement, but they are of assistance, although important, socialization for patients Psychiatric they could not sustain a work placement in a business context. Therefore this type of intervention can not be approached as if it were the same thing at a work placement of people with disabilities enrolled in the categories protected under the law 68/99 that should be taken by companies.
-
Transparency. The tenders which are posted on the website Province of Pistoia, in relation to targeted employment reserved for the disabled (sheltered workshops) is not reported by his own admission the names of companies that are required assumption of the disabled under the law 68/99. Why? I seem to be a factor of transparency include the names of companies, as with other jobs in the placement of non-disabled, also know the names of the latter would be for the disabled, who have not yet been "selected" for no interview work, an opportunity to be able to present directly in the workplace. That alone would be an important factor in the construction process of their gradual independence. Altrimenti molti disabili, come adesso, aspettano senza ricevere una risposta e più che collocati sembrano “parcheggiati” al/dal centro per l'impiego.
La domanda a questo punto sorge spontanea non avendo io come lei accesso a questo tipo d'informazione: la Provincia e il Comune di Pistoia sono in regola rispetto all'obbligatorietà dell'assunzione degli invalidi?
Antonio Sammartino
Segratario regionale del Nuovo Partito d'Azione
0 comments:
Post a Comment